The Future of Research in Australia

Written by WTJ on December 2, 2007 – 7:06 pm -

This article written by Dr. Rowan Gilmore is worth to read.

Where is research in the list, one might ask? It’s buried in there, but many businesses appear to have forgotten to ask the question. Evidence presented by the ABF at the discussion forum indicated that levels of collaboration between innovating businesses and the research sector in Australia are only 2 per cent, compared with 6-7 per cent in similar economies like Ireland, Sweden, and Denmark, and a phenomenal 26 per cent in Sweden. With only one Australian firm in fifty working with the research sector, the question of relevance needs to be raised. Levels of collaboration with customers are no better in Australia and stand at only 12 per cent, compared with typical values of 25-28 per cent for similar economies. Collaboration with suppliers is equally poor.

(link)

Popularity: 1% [?]

Related Post:

  • One Click Could Change Your Future. Belt Up.
  • Australian Immigration for Science Sector
  • Mike ‘Research’ T-shirt
  • Krispy Kreme and Neuroscience
  • Investors Avoid Biotechs in Australia due to IP

  • Tags: , , |

    One Comment to “The Future of Research in Australia”

    1. 中国人权问题 Says:

      李源潮—他是江苏淮阴的,涟水县人,那个出孬种的地方。
      他的晋升很有戏剧性,也有必然性:
      他姐夫(据听说是回良玉/胡锦涛?)就任江苏省省委书记时,他根本就是一个名不见经传的小人物。
      他姐夫爬到中央后,他就顺理成章的成为他姐夫的接班人。
      现在,他有和他姐夫一样,也进了中央。

    Leave a Comment

    RSS